 | |
O/C Heaven - Core 2 Duo E4300
Hardware Overclocking Discussions about overclocking (alt.comp.hardware.overclocking)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
O/C Heaven - Core 2 Duo E4300 -
01-09-2007
, 01:24 AM
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Interesting...so the 2MB cache Conroes actually have 4MB cache, but half of it is disabled? I guess it does make sense, as why would they have one silicon production line for X6800 to E6600, and another for E6400 and E6300 only? |
Here's another test of the 4300:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2903
--
Ed Light
Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org
http://antiwar.com
Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"VanShania" <rvans (AT) mts (DOT) net> wrote Read the two articles. They explain why the 4300 is so much better than the 6300 for an overclocker. Since it has a lower fsb and lower multiplier, you |
Anyhow, with the low default fsb of 200 you've got it up to 2.7 gigs at only
a 300 fsb.
--
Ed Light
Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org
http://antiwar.com
Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.
#4
| |||
| |||
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:24:39 -0800, "Ed Light" <nobody (AT) nobody (DOT) there wrote: Overclocking ENGINEERING SAMPLES is not a valid example of what you can expect from a retail purchase. ENGINEERING SAMPLES are HAND PICKED parts that the manufactures send to review sites to get the FREE PR in how great the LATEST chip is going to be. Consumers Report reviews by actually purchasing RETAIL, they REFUSE any item sent by the manufacturer. Please name one review site that does the same (purchase retail)? Only then would the overclocking data be valid. And a SAMPLE of MORE THAN ONE is also needed. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Are you unclear on how CPUs are manufactured? |
transfer? Little trick they have, putting axle grease under the spreader?
Quote:
|
Have you ever seen 'Consumer Reports' get ANYTHING right about personal computers? |
get it all when they're done testing?
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
'Steve' wrote, in part: | Overclocking ENGINEERING SAMPLES is not a valid example of what you | can expect from a retail purchase. _____ Are you unclear on the meaning of overclocking? |
Quote:
|
Are you unclear on how CPUs are manufactured? |
Quote:
|
Have you ever seen 'Consumer Reports' get ANYTHING right about personal computers? |
purchasing RETAIL" has to do with any item, for example: Toaster or
Microwave.
Quote:
|
Phil Weldon "Steve" <Somewhere@overtherainbow> wrote in message news:g10rq2p0e9t1cck2gchj6uhhosasd2ih53 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... | On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:24:39 -0800, "Ed Light" <nobody (AT) nobody (DOT) there | wrote: | | Overclocking ENGINEERING SAMPLES is not a valid example of what you | can expect from a retail purchase. | | ENGINEERING SAMPLES are HAND PICKED parts that the manufactures send | to review sites to get the FREE PR in how great the LATEST chip is | going to be. | | Consumers Report reviews by actually purchasing RETAIL, they REFUSE | any item sent by the manufacturer. | | Please name one review site that does the same (purchase retail)? | | Only then would the overclocking data be valid. | | And a SAMPLE of MORE THAN ONE is also needed. | |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Steve" alleges, maybe by accident, that I wrote the following. However I didn't. Whoever wrote it, no need to SHOUT. |
You posted a message in this newsgroup with the title "O/C Heaven -
Core 2 Duo E4300" and a link to an article about same. You supplied no
additional text. This implies you agree with said article since you
posted nothing to state otherwise.
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
'Steve' posted: | No, I allege nothing. | | You posted a message in this newsgroup with the title "O/C Heaven - | Core 2 Duo E4300" and a link to an article about same. You supplied no | additional text. This implies you agree with said article since you | posted nothing to state otherwise. _____ Are you unclear on the nature of Usenet? Are you unclear on the nature of quoting? Phil Weldon "Steve" <Somewhere@overtherainbow> wrote in message news:5982r29ro9njb0mfhqrn57jqb93skl9vl7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... | On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:37:56 -0800, "Ed Light" <nobody (AT) nobody (DOT) there | wrote: | | >"Steve" alleges, maybe by accident, that I wrote the following. However I | >didn't. Whoever wrote it, no need to SHOUT. | | No, I allege nothing. | | You posted a message in this newsgroup with the title "O/C Heaven - | Core 2 Duo E4300" and a link to an article about same. You supplied no | additional text. This implies you agree with said article since you | posted nothing to state otherwise. | |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Any tests on stock retail HS? bob "Phil Weldon" <notdiscosed (AT) example (DOT) com> wrote in message news:Xrfsh.16379$X72.12833 (AT) newsread3 (DOT) news.pas.earthlink.net... 'Steve' posted: | No, I allege nothing. | | You posted a message in this newsgroup with the title "O/C Heaven - | Core 2 Duo E4300" and a link to an article about same. You supplied no | additional text. This implies you agree with said article since you | posted nothing to state otherwise. _____ Are you unclear on the nature of Usenet? Are you unclear on the nature of quoting? Phil Weldon "Steve" <Somewhere@overtherainbow> wrote in message news:5982r29ro9njb0mfhqrn57jqb93skl9vl7 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... | On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:37:56 -0800, "Ed Light" <nobody (AT) nobody (DOT) there | wrote: | | >"Steve" alleges, maybe by accident, that I wrote the following. However I | >didn't. Whoever wrote it, no need to SHOUT. | | No, I allege nothing. | | You posted a message in this newsgroup with the title "O/C Heaven - | Core 2 Duo E4300" and a link to an article about same. You supplied no | additional text. This implies you agree with said article since you | posted nothing to state otherwise. | |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.