Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+

#11

Grateful Gift wrote:

Quote:

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Slwuf.66780$uR.22884 (AT) newsfe7-gui (DOT) ntli.net...
Kimmy wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:22:34 GMT, "Forum User"
forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

Flunk math?

Nope.
But it's just a bit c**tish to expect people to do the arithmetic
(mental or otherwise) because one is too much of a dork to state it
oneself.

Sorry, LOL, but I already said it was a 200MHz OC, and I don't
really see the point in the CPU MHz, all that really matters is
what you can OC it over the defaults.

What good is stating the o/c, if you don't state the default ?

AMD Athlon 64-X2 4200+
200 x 11 = 2200 (default CPU setting)
218 x 11 = 2398 (1st overclocking try @ 1.35V)

peace,
kimmy

fucking look it up!

P*ss off, ya c**ting moron !
Some of us have better things to do with our lives spending it compensating
for dork omissions.

Quote:

Your input forum user is unhelpful.

And yours is that of a total c**nt.

#12

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Grateful Gift wrote:
"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Slwuf.66780$uR.22884 (AT) newsfe7-gui (DOT) ntli.net...
Kimmy wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:22:34 GMT, "Forum User"
forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

Flunk math?

Nope.
But it's just a bit c**tish to expect people to do the arithmetic
(mental or otherwise) because one is too much of a dork to state it
oneself.

Sorry, LOL, but I already said it was a 200MHz OC, and I don't
really see the point in the CPU MHz, all that really matters is
what you can OC it over the defaults.

What good is stating the o/c, if you don't state the default ?

AMD Athlon 64-X2 4200+
200 x 11 = 2200 (default CPU setting)
218 x 11 = 2398 (1st overclocking try @ 1.35V)

peace,
kimmy

fucking look it up!

P*ss off, ya c**ting moron !
Some of us have better things to do with our lives spending it
compensating for dork omissions.

Your input forum user is unhelpful.

And yours is that of a total c**nt.

what a nice individual big kiss to you too!

#13

"Grateful Gift" <sacrum (AT) clara (DOT) co.uk> wrote

Quote:

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news

nyuf.66911$uR.52924 (AT) newsfe7-gui (DOT) ntli.net...
Grateful Gift wrote:
"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
news:Slwuf.66780$uR.22884 (AT) newsfe7-gui (DOT) ntli.net...
Kimmy wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:22:34 GMT, "Forum User"
forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote:

Flunk math?

Nope.
But it's just a bit c**tish to expect people to do the arithmetic
(mental or otherwise) because one is too much of a dork to state it
oneself.

Sorry, LOL, but I already said it was a 200MHz OC, and I don't
really see the point in the CPU MHz, all that really matters is
what you can OC it over the defaults.

What good is stating the o/c, if you don't state the default ?

AMD Athlon 64-X2 4200+
200 x 11 = 2200 (default CPU setting)
218 x 11 = 2398 (1st overclocking try @ 1.35V)

peace,
kimmy

fucking look it up!

P*ss off, ya c**ting moron !
Some of us have better things to do with our lives spending it
compensating for dork omissions.

Your input forum user is unhelpful.

And yours is that of a total c**nt.

what a nice individual big kiss to you too!
oh forgot to say.....

PRICK!

#14

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote >> I have a 4200+, so far I've
only tried a 200MHz OC (218x11)

Quote:

Donchya just hate c**ts who don't state the gross overclock, ie - 2.38 GHz
?

Whip out a calcylator. Overclocking in work.

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

#15

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

Donchya just hate c**ts who don't state the gross overclock, ie -
2.38 GHz ?

Flunk math?

Nope.
But it's just a bit c**tish to expect people to do the arithmetic (mental
or otherwise) because one is too much of a dork to state it oneself.

Why behave in a way that would get you booted from a private newsgroup?

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

#16

"Kimmy" <justagirl (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:22:34 GMT, "Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com
wrote:

Flunk math?

Nope.
But it's just a bit c**tish to expect people to do the arithmetic (mental
or
otherwise) because one is too much of a dork to state it oneself.

Sorry, LOL, but I already said it was a 200MHz OC, and I don't really
see the point in the CPU MHz, all that really matters is what you can OC
it over the defaults.

AMD Athlon 64-X2 4200+
200 x 11 = 2200 (default CPU setting)
218 x 11 = 2398 (1st overclocking try @ 1.35V)

peace,
kimmy
--
200*11=2200
201*11=2211
202*11=2222
203*11=2233
204*11=2244
205*11=2255
206*11=2266
207*11=2277
208*11=2288
209*11=2299
210*11=2310
211*11=2321
212*11=2332
213*11=2343
214*11=2354
215*11=2365
216*11=2376
217*11=2387
218*11=2398
219*11=2409
220*11=2420
221*11=2431
222*11=2442
223*11=2453
224*11=2464
225*11=2475
226*11=2486
227*11=2497
228*11=2508
229*11=2519
230*11=2530
231*11=2541
232*11=2552
233*11=2563
234*11=2574
235*11=2585
236*11=2596
237*11=2607
238*11=2618
239*11=2629
240*11=2640
241*11=2651
242*11=2662
243*11=2673
244*11=2684
245*11=2695
246*11=2706
247*11=2717
248*11=2728
249*11=2739
250*11=2750
251*11=2761
252*11=2772
253*11=2783
254*11=2794
255*11=2805
256*11=2816
257*11=2827
258*11=2838
259*11=2849
260*11=2860
261*11=2871
262*11=2882
263*11=2893
264*11=2904
265*11=2915
266*11=2926
267*11=2937
268*11=2948
269*11=2959
270*11=2970
271*11=2981
272*11=2992
273*11=3003
274*11=3014
275*11=3025
276*11=3036
277*11=3047
278*11=3058
279*11=3069
280*11=3080
281*11=3091
282*11=3102
283*11=3113
284*11=3124
285*11=3135
286*11=3146
287*11=3157
288*11=3168
289*11=3179
290*11=3190
291*11=3201
292*11=3212
293*11=3223
294*11=3234
295*11=3245
296*11=3256
297*11=3267
298*11=3278
299*11=3289
300*11=3300

Oh, why did you reward him?

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

#17

Grateful Gift wrote:

Quote:

"Grateful Gift" <sacrum (AT) clara (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message
news:1136313906.36238.0 (AT) demeter (DOT) uk.clara.net...

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote in message
P*ss off, ya c**ting moron !
Some of us have better things to do with our lives spending it
compensating for dork omissions.

Your input forum user is unhelpful.

And yours is that of a total c**nt.

what a nice individual big kiss to you too!
oh forgot to say.....

PRICK!

Kiddies! Take it somewhere else please. And you wonder why there aren't a
lot of posts here? It's because of morons like you posting threads like
this. The serious OC'ers can't be bothered with this shit.

Buh-bye now.
--
~misfit~

#18

"Kimmy" <justagirl (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:02:10 GMT, "Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com
wrote:

What good is stating the o/c, if you don't state the default ?

Hehehe, Hell I just figured this is an overclocking group and you gurus
already know all that BS, guess I came to the wrong place, hmmmmm no
wonder there are no post in this group, sheesh!

If he can't figure it out himself I doubt that he's a guru. He's a flamer
who would be booted from a private group by the moderator.

Maybe don't answer him.

Oops, I did.

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

#19

"Forum User" <forum_user (AT) ntlworld (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:

P*ss off, ya c**ting moron !
Some of us have better things to do with our lives spending it
compensating for dork omissions.

Then leave.

Filtering you out...

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

#20

"~misfit~" <misfit61nz (AT) wahoo (DOT) co.nz> wrote

Quote:

And yours is that of a total c**nt.

what a nice individual big kiss to you too!
oh forgot to say.....

PRICK!

Kiddies! Take it somewhere else please. And you wonder why there aren't a
lot of posts here? It's because of morons like you posting threads like
this. The serious OC'ers can't be bothered with this shit.

Well, don't blame anyone but the perpetrator, please.

--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam (AT) uce (DOT) gov
Thanks, robots.

Bring the Troops Home:
http://bringthemhomenow.org

Fight Spam:
http://bluesecurity.com

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+

Hardware Overclocking Discussions about overclocking (alt.comp.hardware.overclocking)

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 12:20 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 01:45 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 05:31 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:29 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:30 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:33 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:34 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:35 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:36 PM

Re: Overclocking Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4400+ - 01-03-2006 , 07:43 PM