![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
Try this for monitoring temperature: http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
I tried Core Temp. The dual temperature display is nice, but the core voltage display reports the default voltage, not the actual voltage. |
#23
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Ed Medlin wrote: You know, I thought I would have problems with the top drive bay and the video cards. I am losing one (the top one) drive bay because of the ears on the removable sliders do touch the top 8800. The rest of the bays are fine. I can't figure out the procedure for mounting a drive in that sucker. Swiftech did not ship instructions for the Antec case, so I am on my own there. Mounting which drive? http://www.silentpcreview.com/article255-page4.html I had the most trouble with the floppy and optical drives, knowing which holes to use. |
|
Here is the downloadable manual, if you'd call it that: http://www.antec.com/us/productDetai...?ProdID=81802# I assure you the one that came with it is no better and much smaller! I found the online reviews of the case more helpful than the manual. |
|
The bottom drives are actually harder to get wiring to than the top. I have to route the SATA and power cables through a small hole just beside the 100mm center fan. Yes, it makes for quite a rat's nest. You do know that panel slides, though, right? http://www.silentpcreview.com/article255-page3.html |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
Phil Weldon wrote: 'Paul' wrote, in part: | This web site does anatomy checks. The NeoHE 550 has one 12V rail to | run its three outputs. | | http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/361/5 | | Between www.jonnyguru.com and hardwaresecrets.com , you'd be surprised | how many supplies are breaking the rules. PC Power and Cooling is | being honest about it, while the others practice deception. _____ What Hardware Secrets naively call 'jumpers' are actually shunts. Each rail has a shunt. The over-current sensor measures the voltage drop across the shunt. In the case of the three +12 VDC rails if any of the three sensors measures an overcurrent then the entire + 12 VDC is shut down or limited. Page 29 of http://www.formfactors.org/developer...public_br2.pdf explains the short circuit and current limit protection. The Antec Neo HE 550 provides this through an IC that, among many other functions, senses the voltage drop across the three + 12 VDC shunts ( + 12 VDC for the CPU, + 12V1DC and + 12V2DC. So it really is that the 650 Watt PC Power & Cooling supply does not adhere to the specifications while the Antec Neo HE 530 does. Phil Weldon I agree. I didn't click on all the pictures and try my own reverse engineering, so I missed that. I see they are labeled on the PCB as "R508" and "R509", so they do look like they're intended to be resistors. There are supplies that don't have a current limit, because on at least one of them, they managed to draw 30A from the 12V rail, even though the label on the supply was rated for a lot less. Like I mentioned, I'd really prefer if the jonnyguru site would include some overcurrent testing, just to see what will come out. Overcurrent circuits have to be set a bit higher than the rating on the label (like maybe 30% higher), and with a power supply tester, it would only take a few minutes of testing, to see how far each rail can go, and whether the current level is just 30% over, or a lot more. And I don't understand how this 20A limit thing is being handled. For example, the PC Power and Cooling Supply, has quite different agency approval stamps on it, than another supply I looked at. Very minimal in fact, on the Silencer 750. But what is weird is, the claimed 240W secondary limit is supposed to be part of IEC 60950 (and follow-on specs). At least, that is what a couple of the ATX power supply specs (from formfactors.org) say. So, when I look at this product: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817148008 the output is listed as 12V @ 35A, implying a single output, and yet they have a number of agency approvals listed with 60950 in the title. (This is in the specification section of that page.) What I'm missing here, is I've never seen a copy of 60950, either the older ones (when it was called IEC 950), or the more recent ones. I don't know if someone doesn't feel the spec applies to them, or what. Paul |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |