HighDots.NET Computer Hardware Forums  

Re: Athlon/Athlon XP/Duron???

Hardware Overclocking Discussions about overclocking (alt.comp.hardware.overclocking)


Discuss Re: Athlon/Athlon XP/Duron??? in the Hardware Overclocking forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
rapscallion
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Athlon/Athlon XP/Duron??? - 03-11-2006 , 01:32 PM






The Athlons are just a family of processors that range from the $100
Athon XPs to the $1000 Athlon 64 FX60.

Since you've been an Intel user, the best place to start would be
knowing that the Athlon XPs were meant to compete with the Pentiums,
and their name would indicate their Intel counterpart. For example,
the Athlon XP 1700 is comparable to a Pentium 1.7 Ghz chip.

The Duron family, on the other hand, was meant to go head to head with
Intel's Celerons. They've since been replaced by the Semprons as their
entry level CPUs. With this in mind, you would want an Athlon XP over
a Duron, for the same reason that you would want a Pentium over a
Celeron.

The ASUS A7V333 is a Socket A motherboard, and as such can only go up
to an Athlon XP 3200. Make sure you buy a Socket A compatible CPU!
The AMD Socket A motherboards were replaced by the Socket 754, which
were then replaced by the Socket 939s, which will soon be replaced by
the M2 motherboards. These motherboards take CPUs with different pin
configurations so none of them are compatible with each other.

For more information on your board, you might want to check out the
ASUS website, or check this site out:

http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/asus...3/a7v333p1.htm

Also, for Socket A CPUs, check out Newegg.com.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
~misfit~
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Athlon/Athlon XP/Duron??? - 03-23-2006 , 09:56 PM






Xposting snipped.

* * Chas wrote:
Quote:
"Ansgar Strickerschmidt" <dropspamhere (AT) onlinehome (DOT) de> wrote in message
newsp.s6cg76hxj1ei0p (AT) stargar (DOT) de...
Ansgar Strickerschmidt schrub:

PS: BTW, this is a GERMAN-speaking newsgroup.

Oops, didn't notice the X-Post list... was meant for
de.comp.hardware.cpu+mainboard.amd (and the other de.*-groups...).

Ansgar

That's Ok, I didn't catch that the OP cross posted either.

AMD's change in number designations for the XP and later Athlons was a
marketing move.

Slower clock speed AMD CPUs were outperforming higher clock speed
Pentiums but that concept was lost on most PC buyers who were trained
by advertising that the higher the MHz number, the faster a system
would run.
My take on that was that the XP numbers was a *counter-marketing* move.
Intel moved to the vastly inferior P4 architecture to keep MHz numbers up as
they knew buyers looked at those. *That* was the original marketing move,
and one that Intel have only recently given up on. AMD simply introduced the
XP number as an indication of what their CPUs could do against the vastly
inferior P4s (although they said the XP number referenced the original
Athlon to head off litigation).

Only now have Intel given up on their dead-end P4 and gone back to improved
versions of the P3 (Pentium M etc). They stuck with a crap architecture for
years simply to try to influence market share by stressing MHz rather than
power. Now they know they're beaten by AMD they've put their tail between
their legs and gone back to a sensible architechture.
--
~Shaun~




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.