HighDots.NET Computer Hardware Forums  

PCI or AGP?

Matrox Videocards Matrox Videocards Discussions (alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox)


Discuss PCI or AGP? in the Matrox Videocards forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
AJ
 
Posts: n/a

Default PCI or AGP? - 08-21-2004 , 02:36 AM






With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is
AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor
is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best
choice still for 2D (most compatible)?

AJ



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
J. Clarke
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-21-2004 , 10:43 AM






AJ wrote:

Quote:
With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is
AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor
is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best
choice still for 2D (most compatible)?
PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon.
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever
marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not
backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.

In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, since the
new standard is not PCI in anything but name.

Quote:
AJ
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
AJ
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-21-2004 , 07:33 PM




"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote

Quote:
AJ wrote:

With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is
AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor
is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best
choice still for 2D (most compatible)?

PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon.
Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But AGP is going away now whereas PCI has
a few more years it seems since the transitionary motherboards have both
PCIe and PCI slots, but no AGP slot.

Quote:
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever
marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not
backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.
I'm sure they evaluated the possibility, but decided it was better to move
forward than hang on to the past for good reasons. :/

Quote:
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, since the
new standard is not PCI in anything but name.
Well it probably is still a valid technology acronym. What does it stand for?

AJ




Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Richard Hopkins
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-21-2004 , 08:07 PM



"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote

Quote:
PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain
values of soon.
The old style 33MHz/32 bit PCI slots should be supported for a year or so
yet.

Quote:
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and
whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI
standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.
What the f**k are you talking about? For starters, PCI-E chipsets *are*
backward compatible with the earlier PCI standards - that's why the current
PCI-E motherboards have old style PCI slots on them. And secondly, the
reason why it's called PCI something or other is because the standard was
devised by the Peripheral Component Interconnect steering group.

Quote:
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud,
Bollocks, in a word.

Quote:
since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name.
Of course it is. It was designed by the PCI steering group, just like the
previous PCI standards. It has as much right to use the acronym as any of
the others.
--


Richard Hopkins
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
(replace .nospam with .com in reply address)

The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com
Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com




Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
AJ
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-21-2004 , 08:31 PM




"Richard Hopkins" <richh (AT) dsl (DOT) nospam.co.uk> wrote

Quote:
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote

PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain
values of soon.

The old style 33MHz/32 bit PCI slots should be supported for a year or so yet.
I wonder how long the "old" motherboards will be available in the various
channels. For what I do and will be doing in the foreseeable future,
PCI and Northwoods are entirely adequate (overkill actually).

Quote:
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and
whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI
standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.

What the f**k are you talking about? For starters, PCI-E chipsets *are* backward compatible with the earlier PCI
standards - that's why the current PCI-E motherboards have old style PCI slots on them.
I'm almost sure he meant compatible as in "PCI card will work in a PCIe slot".

AJ




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
J. Clarke
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-22-2004 , 01:48 AM



AJ wrote:

Quote:
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:cg7o2c0ojv (AT) news3 (DOT) newsguy.com...
AJ wrote:

With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is
AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor
is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best
choice still for 2D (most compatible)?

PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of
soon.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But AGP is going away now whereas PCI has
a few more years it seems since the transitionary motherboards have both
PCIe and PCI slots, but no AGP slot.

Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever
marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not
backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.

I'm sure they evaluated the possibility, but decided it was better to move
forward than hang on to the past for good reasons. :/
Yes, they did. If they were backward-compatible then people wouldn't have
to buy new everything at once.

There is a backward-compatible version of PCI with plenty of performance
called "PCI-X" that predates PCI Express. If you read the fine print on
Intel chipsets you'll find that they use PCI-X internally, not PCI Express.
Note how the names can be easily confused.

Quote:
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, since
the new standard is not PCI in anything but name.

Well it probably is still a valid technology acronym. What does it stand
for?
"Peripheral Component Interconnect". However it is not a general purpose
acronym--if it was then one could argue that ISA, EISA, Microchannel,
VMEBus, and all the rest are all "PCI".

Quote:
AJ
--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
J. Clarke
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: PCI or AGP? - 08-22-2004 , 01:54 AM



Richard Hopkins wrote:

Quote:
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message
news:cg7o2c0ojv (AT) news3 (DOT) newsguy.com...
PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain
values of soon.

The old style 33MHz/32 bit PCI slots should be supported for a year or so
yet.

Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and
whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI
standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard.

What the f**k are you talking about? For starters, PCI-E chipsets *are*
backward compatible with the earlier PCI standards - that's why the
current PCI-E motherboards have old style PCI slots on them.
When you get your first PCI-Express motherboard then try putting a PCI board
in a PCI Express slot and tell me how it works out.

Quote:
And secondly,
the reason why it's called PCI something or other is because the standard
was devised by the Peripheral Component Interconnect steering group.
AKA Intel and their myrmidons.

Quote:
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud,

Bollocks, in a word.
I'll see your bollocks and raise you nuts.

Quote:
since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name.

Of course it is. It was designed by the PCI steering group, just like the
previous PCI standards. It has as much right to use the acronym as any of
the others.
Uh huh. Basically a rubber stamp for Intel.

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.