![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best choice still for 2D (most compatible)? |
|
AJ |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
AJ wrote: With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best choice still for 2D (most compatible)? PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon. |
|
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard. |
|
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name. |
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon. |
|
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard. |
|
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, |
|
since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon. The old style 33MHz/32 bit PCI slots should be supported for a year or so yet. |
|
Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard. What the f**k are you talking about? For starters, PCI-E chipsets *are* backward compatible with the earlier PCI standards - that's why the current PCI-E motherboards have old style PCI slots on them. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:cg7o2c0ojv (AT) news3 (DOT) newsguy.com... AJ wrote: With the new kid on the block being PCI-express, is AGP soon to be not found on motherboards and therefor is it unwise to invest in an AGP card? Is PCI the best choice still for 2D (most compatible)? PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon. Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But AGP is going away now whereas PCI has a few more years it seems since the transitionary motherboards have both PCIe and PCI slots, but no AGP slot. Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard. I'm sure they evaluated the possibility, but decided it was better to move forward than hang on to the past for good reasons. :/ |
|
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name. Well it probably is still a valid technology acronym. What does it stand for? |
|
AJ |
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
"J. Clarke" <jclarke (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote in message news:cg7o2c0ojv (AT) news3 (DOT) newsguy.com... PCI is also soon not to be found on motherboards for certain values of soon. The old style 33MHz/32 bit PCI slots should be supported for a year or so yet. Personally I'd like to have five minutes with a baseball bat and whatever marketing genius came up with the idea of a new PCI standard that's not backward-compatible with the old PCI standard. What the f**k are you talking about? For starters, PCI-E chipsets *are* backward compatible with the earlier PCI standards - that's why the current PCI-E motherboards have old style PCI slots on them. |
|
And secondly, the reason why it's called PCI something or other is because the standard was devised by the Peripheral Component Interconnect steering group. |
|
In fact one could argue that the whole PCI Express thing is fraud, Bollocks, in a word. |
|
since the new standard is not PCI in anything but name. Of course it is. It was designed by the PCI steering group, just like the previous PCI standards. It has as much right to use the acronym as any of the others. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |