Hello, I'm looking for a DVI monitor that can support a refresh rate of
100Hz, can anyone suggest one?

thanks,
joe

jjlindula (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:

Huh? Any computer monitor with a DVI jack is going to be an LCD, and
LCD's don't require anything higher than 60Hz. Educate yourself.
Google is your friend.

Hello, thanks for responding to my post. And thank to Google I did find
a TFT monitor that supports DVI and a refresh rate of 100Hz.

The Samsung 460P is a TFT active matrix Monitor with a screen size of
46'' . It has a maximum refresh rate of 100Hz and supports a maximum
resolution of 1366 x 768 .

http://computing.kelkoo.co.uk/b/a/ps...85/114401.html

Looks like you need some educating, there was a monitor that can handle
a refresh rate of 100Hz. Next time don't be so quick with your answer
and expand your mind a little.

<jjlindula (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

Um - that site is hardly your friend - DVI can absolutely NOT support
that format at 100 Hz. The clock rate is way too high for TDMS.

<jjlindula (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote

I will have to respectfully disagree with Not Gimpy; 1366 x 768
at 100 Hz would take a pixel clock somewhere in the neighborhood
of 115-120 MHz, definitely within the 162 MHz top end of a
single-link DVI connection. However...

A 46" 1366 x 768 display is basically intended for TV use; that's
not really a whole lot of pixels, at that screen size, if you intend
to use it as a monitor, up close 'n' personal. The "100 Hz" here
may refer to it being suitable for use with de-interlaced versions
of European-rate (i.e., 50 Hz field rate, 2:1 interlaced) HD video.
But outside of THAT - why would you want 100 Hz refresh in the
first place?

Bob M.

jjlindula (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:

Idiot. I wrote "LCD's don't require anything higher than 60Hz", and I
was right. I did not claim that none existed that would support >60Hz
input. Learn how to read for comprehension.

Bottom line: You're looking the fool for even shopping for an LCD
that supports 100Hz refresh. Educate yourself why.

P.S. Learn how to quote what you're responding to, newbie.

chrisv,

Thanks for the scolding. In my orginal post I only mentioned a DVI
monitor, which could have been many types of monitors, such as LCD or
plasma, etc. The reason for the 100Hz refresh rate, well maybe I'm
working on custom video card that supports that rate. The point is, I
don't see why so many people are so quick to judge and belittle people
in newsgroups. Maybe those individuals don't have any friends and they
vent their anger in the newsgroups, I don't know.

Lighten up, life's too short

jjlindula (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:

(context dropped by the newbie restored)

Yeah, and I responded "Any computer monitor with a DVI jack is going
to be an LCD" and proceed to discuss LCD's.

Since what I stated about LCD's was correct, there was no excuse for
your attacking me with "Looks like you need some educating, there was
a monitor that can handle a refresh rate of 100Hz. Next time don't be
so quick with your answer"

Maybe? "Maybe" you're just clueless.

That's very ironic, coming from you (see below).

"Maybe" you're an asshole who deals-out insults like the above
implication that I "don't have any friends" while at the same time
thinking you're an innocent little angel.

Life's too short to take your shit, when I was only trying to help
you. Yes, getting people to use google-based research IS helping
them.

P.S. Learn how to quote what you're responding to, newbie.