![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
What is the maximum display resolution or the dot pixel of the LCD that you are using? Is that a good monitor in your opinion? |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
kasnem (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1160603559.427692.60970 (AT) m73g2000cwd (DOT) googlegroups.com... What is the maximum display resolution or the dot pixel of the LCD that you are using? Is that a good monitor in your opinion? I'm not sure how this is relevant, but at the moment I'm using a laptop PC since I'm on a business trip (in Taiwan currently, and oddly enough visiting LCD manufacturers, which is part of what I do for a living). This one happens to be a 12.1" XGA (1024 x 768), which would mean a resolution of approx. 106 ppi. When in the office, I'm currently using a 19" SXGA (1280 x 1024) monitor, which would be about 86 ppi. I'm happy with it. By "dot pixel," do you mean "dot pitch"? Bob M. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just received a Dell 1907FP 19 inch LCD monitor. It has a very visible grid matrix on the screen like a layer of nets that turns lines into fuzzy dots. After a few hours of using it, my eyes is killing me. I checked my previous Viewsonics VX700 17 inch LCD and there is no such visible grid matrix on the screen. There are several possible explanations: 1. The Dell 1907FP is using a grid matrix wire to provide current to the pixels, the VX700 is using different technology which has less visible grid matrix. 2. The VX700's dot pixel is only .25 mm and thus is less visible than the 1907FP which has .294 mm dot pixel. 3. All of the above. Anyone knows the reason why these two LCDs look so different? (Most 19" LCD uses .294 mm dot pixels. Will a genric 20.1" LCD with .255 mm dot pixel solve this problem?) |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |