![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please read this article if you are in the market for a Maxtor DiamondMax hard drive. My experience was with the 6L250S0 DiamondMax 10 SATA I 250GB model, but may also apply to other DiamondMax series drives. Read the whole article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html Cut to the chase: http://www.mindspring.com/ ~anorton1/A_Case_of_Maxtaken_Identity.html#NotHardDrive Alan Norton Reviews: ABIT AN8 SLI, ECS P965T-A & Foxconn 975X7AB-8EKRS2H Mb's Choosing the Right Version Of Vista - Vista Confusion Article Arizona Pics and Cute Animal Pics http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/ |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please read this article if you are in the market for a Maxtor DiamondMax hard drive. My experience was with the 6L250S0 DiamondMax 10 SATA I 250GB model, but may also apply to other DiamondMax series drives. Read the whole article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html Cut to the chase: http://www.mindspring.com/ ~anorton1/A_Case_of_Maxtaken_Identity.html#NotHardDrive |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote in news:Xns9929C48114238Pecos (AT) 66 (DOT) 150.105.47: Please read this article if you are in the market for a Maxtor DiamondMax hard drive. My experience was with the 6L250S0 DiamondMax 10 SATA I 250GB model, but may also apply to other DiamondMax series drives. Read the whole article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html Cut to the chase: http://www.mindspring.com/ ~anorton1/A_Case_of_Maxtaken_Identity.html#NotHardDrive clip sig I am seeking advice from all of you experienced hardware experts out there to write the final chapter in A Case of Maxtaken Identity. I am still trying to replace my now defunct Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA I 1.5 GB/s 16 MB hard drive, one of two drives in my RAID array. I now have several options. During a call to Seagate/Maxtor to get some information about their Maxtor Maxline III models, I happened to ask them if there was a warranty on my refurbished drive. The surprise answer was that it was still under warranty. I was very happy to hear this. After I received the email stating what I needed to do to send the drive to them, I noted that they have a program that would allow me to receive a hard drive via two day air before returning the bad drive. They would also send the packaging needed for returning the bad drive (which I need) and prepay for the return shipping. This would cost $19.99. I also noticed in the email that physical damage to the drive would void the warranty. When I called Seagate/Maxtor back to cancel the original RMA and sign up for the Advanced Replacement program, I was honest and told them that after the drive had failed, I had taken it out and tapped it on the floor to free any possible stuck heads. I knew this trick sometimes worked with older drives. The support person told me that if the drive was damaged internally, I would be charged for a replacement drive. I also told her that the drive clicks five or more times during POST. I don't know if it did that before my 'last chance' risky fix, that wasn't a last chance risky fix after all now that I know it had a warranty. ;-) Option 1: Return the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 6L250S0 GB SATA I 16 MB NCQ drive to Seagate/Maxtor for a replacement drive. The replacement drive will most likely also be a refurbished drive. Risk the additional cost of a replacement drive if the warranty has been voided. The warranty expires April 16, 2009. |
|
Option 2: Buy two new Maxtor Maxline III 7V250F0 250 GB SATA II 16 MB NCQ drives with 3 year warranties. Cost: $130 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is good $50 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is void This seemed like a no-brainer until I read about the possibility that I may have voided the warranty. So all of you esteemed hardware veterans out there - have I toasted my old drive and will it have internal damage? Has this in fact voided my warranty? Please help me write the final chapter in my article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html I will tally up the votes for Options 1 and 2 and will update my webpage with a summary of who voted and how you voted. I am doing this as a sort of an experiment. Unless I have a really good reason not to, I am letting you make the final(??) choice for me. Voting ends 3 PM EST May 15 or until I place my order. Additional comments/advice as to your choice is appreciated but not necessary. Alan Norton Reviews: ABIT AN8 SLI, ECS P965T-A & Foxconn 975X7AB-8EKRS2H Mb's Choosing the Right Version Of Vista - Vista Confusion Article Arizona Pics and Cute Animal Pics http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/ |
#5
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
|
Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote Please read this article if you are in the market for a Maxtor DiamondMax hard drive. My experience was with the 6L250S0 DiamondMax 10 SATA I 250GB model, but may also apply to other DiamondMax series drives. Read the whole article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html Cut to the chase: http://www.mindspring.com/ ~anorton1/A_Case_of_Maxtaken_Identity.html#NotHardDrive I am seeking advice from all of you experienced hardware experts out there to write the final chapter in A Case of Maxtaken Identity. I am still trying to replace my now defunct Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA I 1.5 GB/s 16 MB hard drive, one of two drives in my RAID array. I now have several options. During a call to Seagate/Maxtor to get some information about their Maxtor Maxline III models, I happened to ask them if there was a warranty on my refurbished drive. The surprise answer was that it was still under warranty. I was very happy to hear this. After I received the email stating what I needed to do to send the drive to them, I noted that they have a program that would allow me to receive a hard drive via two day air before returning the bad drive. They would also send the packaging needed for returning the bad drive (which I need) and prepay for the return shipping. This would cost $19.99. I also noticed in the email that physical damage to the drive would void the warranty. When I called Seagate/Maxtor back to cancel the original RMA and sign up for the Advanced Replacement program, I was honest and told them that after the drive had failed, I had taken it out and tapped it on the floor to free any possible stuck heads. |
|
I knew this trick sometimes worked with older drives. |
|
The support person told me that if the drive was damaged internally, I would be charged for a replacement drive. I also told her that the drive clicks five or more times during POST. |
|
I don't know if it did that before my 'last chance' risky fix, that wasn't a last chance risky fix after all now that I know it had a warranty. ;-) Option 1: Return the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 6L250S0 GB SATA I 16 MB NCQ drive to Seagate/Maxtor for a replacement drive. The replacement drive will most likely also be a refurbished drive. Risk the additional cost of a replacement drive if the warranty has been voided. The warranty expires April 16, 2009. Option 2: Buy two new Maxtor Maxline III 7V250F0 250 GB SATA II 16 MB NCQ drives with 3 year warranties. |
|
Cost: $130 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is good $50 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is void This seemed like a no-brainer until I read about the possibility that I may have voided the warranty. So all of you esteemed hardware veterans out there - have I toasted my old drive and will it have internal damage? |
|
Has this in fact voided my warranty? |
|
Please help me write the final chapter in my article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html I will tally up the votes for Options 1 and 2 and will update my webpage with a summary of who voted and how you voted. I am doing this as a sort of an experiment. Unless I have a really good reason not to, I am letting you make the final(??) choice for me. Voting ends 3 PM EST May 15 or until I place my order. Additional comments/advice as to your choice is appreciated but not necessary. Alan Norton Reviews: ABIT AN8 SLI, ECS P965T-A & Foxconn 975X7AB-8EKRS2H Mb's Choosing the Right Version Of Vista - Vista Confusion Article Arizona Pics and Cute Animal Pics http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/ |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote snip I am seeking advice from all of you experienced hardware experts out there to write the final chapter in A Case of Maxtaken Identity. I am still trying to replace my now defunct Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA I 1.5 GB/s 16 MB hard drive, one of two drives in my RAID array. I now have several options. During a call to Seagate/Maxtor to get some information about their Maxtor Maxline III models, I happened to ask them if there was a warranty on my refurbished drive. The surprise answer was that it was still under warranty. I was very happy to hear this. After I received the email stating what I needed to do to send the drive to them, I noted that they have a program that would allow me to receive a hard drive via two day air before returning the bad drive. They would also send the packaging needed for returning the bad drive (which I need) and prepay for the return shipping. This would cost $19.99. I also noticed in the email that physical damage to the drive would void the warranty. When I called Seagate/Maxtor back to cancel the original RMA and sign up for the Advanced Replacement program, I was honest and told them that after the drive had failed, I had taken it out and tapped it on the floor to free any possible stuck heads. You shouldnt have done that with the symptoms you were getting, the problem wouldnt have been stuck heads. I knew this trick sometimes worked with older drives. Yeah, but not worth trying unless the drive wont spin up. The support person told me that if the drive was damaged internally, I would be charged for a replacement drive. I also told her that the drive clicks five or more times during POST. Thats likely the drive recalibrating when it cant read the platters properly. I don't know if it did that before my 'last chance' risky fix, that wasn't a last chance risky fix after all now that I know it had a warranty. ;-) Option 1: Return the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 6L250S0 GB SATA I 16 MB NCQ drive to Seagate/Maxtor for a replacement drive. The replacement drive will most likely also be a refurbished drive. Risk the additional cost of a replacement drive if the warranty has been voided. The warranty expires April 16, 2009. Option 2: Buy two new Maxtor Maxline III 7V250F0 250 GB SATA II 16 MB NCQ drives with 3 year warranties. I wouldnt consider this, I dont like Maxtor drives and would buy samsungs instead. Cost: $130 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is good $50 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is void This seemed like a no-brainer until I read about the possibility that I may have voided the warranty. So all of you esteemed hardware veterans out there - have I toasted my old drive and will it have internal damage? Impossible for us to say given that we dont know how hard you 'tapped' it on the floor. Has this in fact voided my warranty? Hard to say whether Maxtor will use that as an excuse to void the warranty too. Please help me write the final chapter in my article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html I will tally up the votes for Options 1 and 2 and will update my webpage with a summary of who voted and how you voted. I am doing this as a sort of an experiment. Unless I have a really good reason not to, I am letting you make the final(??) choice for me. Voting ends 3 PM EST May 15 or until I place my order. Additional comments/advice as to your choice is appreciated but not necessary. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote I am seeking advice from all of you experienced hardware experts out there to write the final chapter in A Case of Maxtaken Identity. I am still trying to replace my now defunct Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA I 1.5 GB/s 16 MB hard drive, one of two drives in my RAID array. I now have several options. During a call to Seagate/Maxtor to get some information about their Maxtor Maxline III models, I happened to ask them if there was a warranty on my refurbished drive. The surprise answer was that it was still under warranty. I was very happy to hear this. After I received the email stating what I needed to do to send the drive to them, I noted that they have a program that would allow me to receive a hard drive via two day air before returning the bad drive. They would also send the packaging needed for returning the bad drive (which I need) and prepay for the return shipping. This would cost $19.99. I also noticed in the email that physical damage to the drive would void the warranty. When I called Seagate/Maxtor back to cancel the original RMA and sign up for the Advanced Replacement program, I was honest and told them that after the drive had failed, I had taken it out and tapped it on the floor to free any possible stuck heads. You shouldnt have done that with the symptoms you were getting, the problem wouldnt have been stuck heads. I knew this trick sometimes worked with older drives. Yeah, but not worth trying unless the drive wont spin up. The support person told me that if the drive was damaged internally, I would be charged for a replacement drive. I also told her that the drive clicks five or more times during POST. Thats likely the drive recalibrating when it cant read the platters properly. I don't know if it did that before my 'last chance' risky fix, that wasn't a last chance risky fix after all now that I know it had a warranty. ;-) Option 1: Return the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 6L250S0 GB SATA I 16 MB NCQ drive to Seagate/Maxtor for a replacement drive. The replacement drive will most likely also be a refurbished drive. Risk the additional cost of a replacement drive if the warranty has been voided. The warranty expires April 16, 2009. Option 2: Buy two new Maxtor Maxline III 7V250F0 250 GB SATA II 16 MB NCQ drives with 3 year warranties. I wouldnt consider this, I dont like Maxtor drives and would buy samsungs instead. Cost: $130 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is good $50 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is void This seemed like a no-brainer until I read about the possibility that I may have voided the warranty. So all of you esteemed hardware veterans out there - have I toasted my old drive and will it have internal damage? Impossible for us to say given that we dont know how hard you 'tapped' it on the floor. Has this in fact voided my warranty? Hard to say whether Maxtor will use that as an excuse to void the warranty too. Please help me write the final chapter in my article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html I will tally up the votes for Options 1 and 2 and will update my webpage with a summary of who voted and how you voted. I am doing this as a sort of an experiment. Unless I have a really good reason not to, I am letting you make the final(??) choice for me. Voting ends 3 PM EST May 15 or until I place my order. Additional comments/advice as to your choice is appreciated but not necessary. snip sig Thanks. That is helpful. I have two reasons for wanting to stick with Maxtor. My first Maxtor drive, a 13.6 GB Pulsar drive, lasted 7 1/2 years and when I sent a product reliability report to Maxtor in the form of an obituary for 'my friend Max', they sent me a replacement. Purchasing another Maxtor drive is my small way to thank them. I thought that the clicking noises were crashed head(s) trying to reread the platters, like the old floppies used to do when a floppy disk couldn't be read. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have two reasons for wanting to stick with Maxtor. My first Maxtor drive, a 13.6 GB Pulsar drive, lasted 7 1/2 years and when I sent a product reliability report to Maxtor in the form of an obituary for 'my friend Max', they sent me a replacement. Purchasing another Maxtor drive is my small way to thank them. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pecos <anortRemOveThIs&2on21 (AT) mindspring (DOT) com> wrote in news:Xns9929C48114238Pecos (AT) 66 (DOT) 150.105.47: Please read this article if you are in the market for a Maxtor DiamondMax hard drive. My experience was with the 6L250S0 DiamondMax 10 SATA I 250GB model, but may also apply to other DiamondMax series drives. Read the whole article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html Cut to the chase: http://www.mindspring.com/ ~anorton1/A_Case_of_Maxtaken_Identity.html#NotHardDrive clip sig I am seeking advice from all of you experienced hardware experts out there to write the final chapter in A Case of Maxtaken Identity. I am still trying to replace my now defunct Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB SATA I 1.5 GB/s 16 MB hard drive, one of two drives in my RAID array. I now have several options. During a call to Seagate/Maxtor to get some information about their Maxtor Maxline III models, I happened to ask them if there was a warranty on my refurbished drive. The surprise answer was that it was still under warranty. I was very happy to hear this. After I received the email stating what I needed to do to send the drive to them, I noted that they have a program that would allow me to receive a hard drive via two day air before returning the bad drive. They would also send the packaging needed for returning the bad drive (which I need) and prepay for the return shipping. This would cost $19.99. I also noticed in the email that physical damage to the drive would void the warranty. When I called Seagate/Maxtor back to cancel the original RMA and sign up for the Advanced Replacement program, I was honest and told them that after the drive had failed, I had taken it out and tapped it on the floor to free any possible stuck heads. I knew this trick sometimes worked with older drives. The support person told me that if the drive was damaged internally, I would be charged for a replacement drive. I also told her that the drive clicks five or more times during POST. I don't know if it did that before my 'last chance' risky fix, that wasn't a last chance risky fix after all now that I know it had a warranty. ;-) Option 1: Return the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 6L250S0 GB SATA I 16 MB NCQ drive to Seagate/Maxtor for a replacement drive. The replacement drive will most likely also be a refurbished drive. Risk the additional cost of a replacement drive if the warranty has been voided. The warranty expires April 16, 2009. Option 2: Buy two new Maxtor Maxline III 7V250F0 250 GB SATA II 16 MB NCQ drives with 3 year warranties. Cost: $130 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is good $50 more than Option 1 if the warranty on old drive is void This seemed like a no-brainer until I read about the possibility that I may have voided the warranty. So all of you esteemed hardware veterans out there - have I toasted my old drive and will it have internal damage? Has this in fact voided my warranty? Please help me write the final chapter in my article: http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/..._Identity.html I will tally up the votes for Options 1 and 2 and will update my webpage with a summary of who voted and how you voted. I am doing this as a sort of an experiment. Unless I have a really good reason not to, I am letting you make the final(??) choice for me. Voting ends 3 PM EST May 15 or until I place my order. Additional comments/advice as to your choice is appreciated but not necessary. Alan Norton Reviews: ABIT AN8 SLI, ECS P965T-A & Foxconn 975X7AB-8EKRS2H Mb's Choosing the Right Version Of Vista - Vista Confusion Article Arizona Pics and Cute Animal Pics http://www.mindspring.com/~anorton1/ |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for restoring my confidence again with this post. I almost thought I had seen the first reasonable post from someone on Mindspring and it was deeply troubling to me. Could I have been wrong all these years. Glad to see now that Mindspring is still the home of the braindead and everything else in the world is still as it is supposed to be. All is good now again. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |