![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
updated February 17, 2005) bbond (AT) cfl (DOT) rr.com <- personal | |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Greetings! Here is my question: is it possible for a malfunctioning (travan) tape drive to cause even a new tape to have a write error afterward? snip |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
updated February 17, 2005) bbond (AT) cfl (DOT) rr.com <- personal | |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Allan! snip If the tape drive is writing only marginal records, that would be a problem with the tape drive, correct? (I just want to be sure I understand you.) |
|
That could explain the situation I've had. Except, the fact that it works on some tapes, and, once a tape doesn't work, it REALLY doesn't work -- ever again. I'd think that if the drive was writing only marginal records, the next write would (at least possibly) be readable/good....? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
That could explain the situation I've had. Except, the fact that it works on some tapes, and, once a tape doesn't work, it REALLY doesn't work -- ever again. I'd think that if the drive was writing only marginal records, the next write would (at least possibly) be readable/good....? Fire up your Eyball Mk I and examine the tape (never touch a tape with |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
3)lookk for wrinkles or creasees. a sign that the hub drive (Forward or reverse) may have problems OR the tape stuck to the drum either from condensation (bringing a cold drive into a warm room and not waiting for it to wame up and dry out (been there)) or gummy residue. Ignore.. I notice later that you said Travan which does not use a |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Another possibility is a dirty head. Could you get at it with a baby-bud and alcohol? A dirty head, built up over time, could certainly account for marginal writing, which could cause grief if the tape wasn't quite 100% at a particular point. |
|
updated February 17, 2005) bbond (AT) cfl (DOT) rr.com <- personal | |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Fire up your Eyball Mk I and examine the tape (never touch a tape with bare fingers) for signs of damage: 1) look at the edges for feathered or wavey edges that are a sign of passing thru a drive with guide or other tape path mechanical alignment problems. 2)Look at the flat surface at a angle for pits (dimples) caused by dirt on the guides or drum. |
|
updated February 17, 2005) bbond (AT) cfl (DOT) rr.com <- personal | |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Sometimes a tape would get stretched, which could cause a ripple, which would always give a write error, except that decent error recovery would skip a bad spot. That would only be discovered during writing by a read-after-write head, when the record could be rewritten, otherwise only when the tape came to be read. I have absolutely no idea about Travan drives specs. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Greetings! Here is my question: is it possible for a malfunctioning (travan) tape drive to cause even a new tape to have a write error afterward? Now, some background! :-) I have a Linux computer, a 450 MHz, Pentium II system purchased in mid-1999. It had a travan, TR4, tape drive. I had numerous problems with it, the first three years. (I wound up sending it back, under warranty, a couple of times.) In 2002, I purchased a new travan tape drive. It is TR5 instead of TR4, so this led to the purchase of new travan tapes. This last drive has been pretty good. I don't believe I had many problems with it, until the last six months to a year. I started having backups that didn't finish, for one reason or another. I would purchase brand new travan tapes, and about 30 to 40% of them would work, and slightly over half didn't even work, on the first try. I took many Imation tapes back to Office Depot. About a month ago now, I purchased three more travan tapes from Certance, which seems to be the company that handles Seagate's tape business now. I got three new travan tapes. The first one worked. The second and third one didn't. (Most of the errors are write errors.) I purchased a travan cleaning cartridge, which arrived the middle of this past week. I cleaned the tape drive head. Still, now, the second and third brand new Certance tapes which arrived only a couple of weeks or so ago, are apparently not usable. With this many tape problems, I find myself looking for another possible explanation. At first, I thought that Imation must have had a bad batch of tapes, because only two or three of the six or seven I purchased worked. Now, three new tapes, different brand, from Seagate (or the company who handles their tape business now), still one worked, two didn't. If I didn't have any backups to work, I would look into hardware. But, a backup will work every once in a while. And, I verify it, reading through it again. Not an error. Although not frequently, I have restored some files from a backup before. It worked fine. But, it's like, once a tape has an error, that tape is not usable again. And, I have tried up to five times to write on a tape which had an error, and it always fails, at about the same point in the backup, afterward. At first, I just returned the tapes to Office Depot, and they replaced them (on two or three different trips). But, it got to the point where even the once again new tape, just unwrapped, failed. I have to consider, is there possibly a hardware problem with my tape drive? I do not understand it 100%, but I could see how a malfunctioning tape drive could "garble" data being written to the tape, such that that tape is not readable. But, I would think, in this case, just rewriting over the tape would have the tape still usable. These are write errors, and they always fail at the same point in future backup attempts. At the moment, I have ONE tape which has worked. (The first of the three recently purchased ones from Certance.) I am afraid to try to use it, because if it errors, based on my observations and history, it won't be usable any more, either. I am about to upgrade to a newer version of Linux, and get two new, larger, hard disks. What I'm planning on doing is shut down the current, older, Linux, and go into the cabinet, and remove the two smaller hard disks and replace them with larger hard disks I'm about to purchase. Then, on these new hard disks, install the newer version of Linux. (I then need to have many very important data files on a good, reliable, backup, so I can restore the data files, with all new operating system files already in place.) I would only feel comfortable doing this after I have at least TWO, known, good, reliable backups, from which I can get my data files. (Once I get them on the new Linux system, and back them up then [and I'll be using a different backup scheme, also as of the new Linux system], I'll have them on the hard disks, and on backups of the new system, and I'll feel more comfortable that I have them enough different places to restore them, should something happen.) But, at the rate I'm going, getting at least two known good backups is becoming increasingly difficult, as well as expensive! :-O So, there is some background information. Thank you for sticking with me and reading this far, if you're still reading! :-D If anyone has any revealing information, suggestions, recommendations, etc., I'd be quite pleased to hear (or read) them! :-) Thank you! Barry Tapes, like disks, are formatted; your drive, due to timing or speed |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |