![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
I was not suggesting you were incorrect in your statement, in fact, quite the opposite, but I did want to make others aware than some hybrids already do exist for the Epson printer line, as 3rd party products. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have very few hairs left to split anyway, so you may claim the award if you so desire ;-) |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
One of the main features of piezo head design is how forgiving they are with ink formulations. Thermal heads require the ink boils at a certain temperature and maintains a certain viscosity during the printing process. Piezo technology is more forgiving because the ink is mechanically propelled without heating, and the ink nozzles can be considerably larger then the ink droplet, using the frequency the piezo element is activated to determine how much ink is released. Although I don't suggest trying to run ketchup and mustard through them, as long as the ink is within certain tolerances and of a small enough particle size, it may well work. Piezo heads are being used for everything from dye sublimation inks, to solvent inks, to oil based inks, to conductive inks, to plastics, to food dyes, etc, etc. So, as to your question, yes, there are dozens of 3rd party ink formulations that work with Epson printers. SOme work better than others. Pigmented inks are more abrasive than dye inks, because pigmented inks are made up of actual particles of colorant kept in suspension in the carrier agent. Dyes are molecular and are literally dissolved into the carrier. Over time, therefore, pigmented inks do wear the heads more than dye inks. For the average piezo inkhead printer, it is not too significant an issue. Although I have not looked around, I suspect there are both pigmented inks being should 3rd party for the R200, and CISs. My only concern is the CIS is usually costly enough to make it worthwhile to consider if buying a more robust printer may be worthwhile with a costly investment of a CIS and bulk inks. It is not that the R200 will product poor prints, because it doesn't, but it is designed as an economy printer, and it's cost reflects that. Most people using a CIS print great sums of prints in a short period and a printer with a higher duty cycle may be more reliable. Art Art Te wrote: I'm new the EPSON... I've been a looong time HP user. I recently got an Epson R200 because I wanted to print onto DVDRs. I'm in the market for a continuous ink system for my R200 now... and one of the questions I had was can I use Pigmented inks in a CIS or by refilling the carts with Pigmented inks? As I understand it, pigmented inks give you better quality prints, truer colors and are much longer lasting. Plus as I understand it, the R200 uses DYE inks not Pigmented like the R800. The epson rep told me the heads in the R800 and R200/R300 (et al) are all the same print head? So that sounds to me like I can use pigmented inks... But I know the experts here will chime in ![]() THANKS IN ADVANCE. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Are the pigmented inks worth "upgrading" to from dye inks? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
Great information. Thanks. Are the pigmented inks worth "upgrading" to from dye inks? in other words, is it worth it? "Arthur Entlich" <artistic (AT) telus (DOT) net> wrote in message news:mXitd.326981$9b.306770 (AT) edtnps84 (DOT) .. One of the main features of piezo head design is how forgiving they are with ink formulations. Thermal heads require the ink boils at a certain temperature and maintains a certain viscosity during the printing process. Piezo technology is more forgiving because the ink is mechanically propelled without heating, and the ink nozzles can be considerably larger then the ink droplet, using the frequency the piezo element is activated to determine how much ink is released. Although I don't suggest trying to run ketchup and mustard through them, as long as the ink is within certain tolerances and of a small enough particle size, it may well work. Piezo heads are being used for everything from dye sublimation inks, to solvent inks, to oil based inks, to conductive inks, to plastics, to food dyes, etc, etc. So, as to your question, yes, there are dozens of 3rd party ink formulations that work with Epson printers. SOme work better than others. Pigmented inks are more abrasive than dye inks, because pigmented inks are made up of actual particles of colorant kept in suspension in the carrier agent. Dyes are molecular and are literally dissolved into the carrier. Over time, therefore, pigmented inks do wear the heads more than dye inks. For the average piezo inkhead printer, it is not too significant an issue. Although I have not looked around, I suspect there are both pigmented inks being should 3rd party for the R200, and CISs. My only concern is the CIS is usually costly enough to make it worthwhile to consider if buying a more robust printer may be worthwhile with a costly investment of a CIS and bulk inks. It is not that the R200 will product poor prints, because it doesn't, but it is designed as an economy printer, and it's cost reflects that. Most people using a CIS print great sums of prints in a short period and a printer with a higher duty cycle may be more reliable. Art Art Te wrote: I'm new the EPSON... I've been a looong time HP user. I recently got an Epson R200 because I wanted to print onto DVDRs. I'm in the market for a continuous ink system for my R200 now... and one of the questions I had was can I use Pigmented inks in a CIS or by refilling the carts with Pigmented inks? As I understand it, pigmented inks give you better quality prints, truer colors and are much longer lasting. Plus as I understand it, the R200 uses DYE inks not Pigmented like the R800. The epson rep told me the heads in the R800 and R200/R300 (et al) are all the same print head? So that sounds to me like I can use pigmented inks... But I know the experts here will chime in ![]() THANKS IN ADVANCE. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <Wezud.639953$mD.93733@attbi_s02>, te@-NOSPAM-pobox.com (Te) wrote: Are the pigmented inks worth "upgrading" to from dye inks? No, as the dye component of the ink will fade/run in the same way as in a pure dye ink. It's definitely worth considering pigment inks, though. Jon. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
Oh Jon, stop confusing people unnecessarily because you have a thing about wordsmithing. |
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <uyZud.62233$6f6.24353@edtnps89>, artistic (AT) telus (DOT) net (Arthur Entlich) wrote: Oh Jon, stop confusing people unnecessarily because you have a thing about wordsmithing. The confusion already exists, I'm trying to prevent it causing any future problems by removing it. If someone wants pigment inks but asks for pigmented inks, they may not get what they want. If they ask for pigment inks, they will get want they want. Using terms which have an explicit meaning in a vague way is what confuses people. Jon. |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
So, is ketchup a dye, pigment or pigmented formulation? ;-) |
#20
| |||
| |||
|
|
Fair enough. You are correct that pigment ink and pigmented inks are not interchangeable words. They do refer to differing types of ink formulations. We should all be more careful when discussing inks to use correct terminology. So, is ketchup a dye, pigment or pigmented formulation? ;-) Art Jon O'Brien wrote: In article <uyZud.62233$6f6.24353@edtnps89>, artistic (AT) telus (DOT) net (Arthur Entlich) wrote: Oh Jon, stop confusing people unnecessarily because you have a thing about wordsmithing. The confusion already exists, I'm trying to prevent it causing any future problems by removing it. If someone wants pigment inks but asks for pigmented inks, they may not get what they want. If they ask for pigment inks, they will get want they want. Using terms which have an explicit meaning in a vague way is what confuses people. Jon. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |