 | |
Re: Problem solved:
Printers Technical discussion of printers (comp.periphs.printers)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#41
 
| |||
| |||
|
Re: Problem solved: -
02-10-2010
, 06:55 PM
#42
| |||
| |||
|
| http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2793/...21955dfc_o.jpg No EXIF data. Your argument is invalid. |
the wing-tip speed. You cannot sync flash with a DSLR at that fast of a
shutter speed required. I used incandescent lab lights, you can tell by the
blur. If flash was used then there'd be no blur. Ergo, shot with a
hand-held P&S camera using incandescent lights.
You're just as fuckingly stupid as the rest of the trolls in these groups.
#43
| |||
| |||
|
|
You're just as fuckingly stupid as the rest of the trolls in these groups. |
#44
| |||
| |||
|
|
Here's one that I took, lit with incandescent lab lights only, on an outdoor photography stage, hand-held, no flash. Albeit, not one of the many marketable shots I took, the framing and composition is wrong. When I frame with the EVF or LCD I use the full frame, no room for cropping. None of you will ever see the good ones, they are for private sale only. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2793/...21955dfc_o.jpg |
Good for more than a one-inch print at 300dpi.
#45
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2/10/2010 3:52 PM, Educating the Beginner MoronS wrote: Here's one that I took, lit with incandescent lab lights only, on an outdoor photography stage, hand-held, no flash. Albeit, not one of the many marketable shots I took, the framing and composition is wrong. When I frame with the EVF or LCD I use the full frame, no room for cropping. None of you will ever see the good ones, they are for private sale only. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2793/...21955dfc_o.jpg Wow, 560 pixels! Good for more than a one-inch print at 300dpi. |
this greatly downsized one. Useless trolls like yourself should be grateful
for anything you get at all. Even this reply. Now say "thank-you".
When you learn to respect all others who have far greater skills than
you'll ever have in your lifetime then maybe you too will earn respect one
day. You lousy useless crapshooting cunt of a DSLR-Troll.
Now, where oh where did that PuppyGang TrollBerg go off to ... he was going
to show everyone just pathetically smart he was.... I guess it worked. It
finally shut-up that useless cunt of a pretend-photographer troll too, as
well as a few others just as insanely ignorant about photography and
cameras.
#46
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2/10/2010 3:52 PM, Educating the Beginner MoronS wrote: Here's one that I took, lit with incandescent lab lights only, on an outdoor photography stage, hand-held, no flash. Albeit, not one of the many marketable shots I took, the framing and composition is wrong. When I frame with the EVF or LCD I use the full frame, no room for cropping. None of you will ever see the good ones, they are for private sale only. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2793/...21955dfc_o.jpg Wow, 560 pixels! Good for more than a one-inch print at 300dpi. |
this greatly downsized one. Useless trolls like yourself should be grateful
for anything you get at all. Even this reply. Now say "thank-you".
When you learn to respect all others who have far greater skills than
you'll ever have in your lifetime then maybe you too will earn respect one
day. You lousy useless crapshooting cunt of a DSLR-Troll.
Now, where oh where did that PuppyGang TrollBerg go off to ... he was going
to show everyone just how pathetically smart he was.... I guess it worked.
It finally shut-up that useless cunt of a pretend-photographer troll too,
as well as a few others just as insanely ignorant about photography and
cameras.
#47
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2/10/2010 3:52 PM, Educating the Beginner MoronS wrote: Here's one that I took, lit with incandescent lab lights only, on an outdoor photography stage, hand-held, no flash. Albeit, not one of the many marketable shots I took, the framing and composition is wrong. When I frame with the EVF or LCD I use the full frame, no room for cropping. None of you will ever see the good ones, they are for private sale only. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2793/...21955dfc_o.jpg |
Quote:
|
Wow, 560 pixels! Good for more than a one-inch print at 300dpi. |
#48
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:56:38 +1300, ColinD <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote: Educating the Beginner Moron wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:59:45 +1300, ColinD <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) invalid> wrote: Alan Browne wrote: On 10-02-09 16:27 , ColinD wrote: Too Funny wrote: On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:24:59 -0800, Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net wrote: Are you able to reproduce the photoshop 'mountain' effect in the other programs? If not, they are the one's lacking. All of them can reproduce that effect. If you are willing to take just as many convoluted steps as you do in trying to partially correct it in PhotoSlop. Without any commentary on the relative merits of the various editors you are discussing, can I make a request for you to stop using 'photoslop'as a derogatory play on 'photoshop'? snip And I have no connection with Photoshop in any way, I just get sick of these childish antics, akin to constant name-calling. Collin, does the fact we've been referring to it as a troll hint at anything to you? Cheers, Alan Hello Alan, Yes, it does, but I hoped that he/it might take notice, hope springs eternal and all that ... Cheers Colin D. Now why on earth should anyone with valid information take notice of a pack of whiney resident-trolls calling that person a troll? Resident-trolls aren't too bright. That is irrelevant to the request to use the proper name for Photoshop, and not the adolescent variation repeated endlessly like a schoolboy joke. Hopefully we are all adults in here, though at times the evidence would indicate otherwise. Since you give your moniker as 'Educating the Beginner Moron', I hope you feel educated and somewhat less moronic now. Colin D. The only moron I see is you, by you thinking your behavior is in any way more respectable. I'd spit on you if you were here. That's precisely how much respect you deserve. Oh dear, I see now that you are indeed ineducable, and are doomed to |
And if I *were* there, you would be too scared to spit on me, so that
was a moronic statement made only because you hide behind your anonymity.
You should have stayed as your earlier nym, 'Too Funny', although that
moniker applies to you as well, a real scream in fact.
That's the trouble with you trolls, you nym-shift when it suits you. I
guess *you* didn't like being pulled up on your silly childish wordplay, eh?
How about you just fuck off back where you came from? There's a good boy.
#49
| |||
| |||
|
|
Here's one that I took, lit with incandescent lab lights only, on an |
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer (AT) sonic (DOT) net
#50
| |||
| |||
|
|
Did you know an alligator can consume a whole human body and there's no evidence left whatsoever? ... There's a reason I like to use micro-SD cards in an adapter, |
journey through an alligator than larger cards.
Pete
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.