![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
| |||
| |||
|
|
jeremy wrote: "Eddie" <woofdog (AT) kennel (DOT) com.au> wrote in message news:456e2cad$0$24708$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader- Ken, I believe that Zip compression works best on text data, not a great deal on Pics, which is why jpg developed their compression format. Though I suspect that your point is that zip decompresses to original file. But I still prefer non-compressed file. Tiff will have to do. JPEG 2000 may be the next star image format. It has lossless compression and is alleged to result in smaller file size than TIF. Hi.. I doubt it, it's been around for quite a while, and hasn't made any progress toward popularity at all. Just for the heck of it, I zipped a few tiff's - started at 40 megs, zipped to an average of about 27 megs. But I agree that the way to go is uncompressed, make it as easy and safe as possible for future generations who may want to see them. I would say that you want to archive both tiff and jpeg. Whereas tiff |
#32
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ken Weitzel wrote: jeremy wrote: "Eddie" <woofdog (AT) kennel (DOT) com.au> wrote in message news:456e2cad$0$24708$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader- Ken, I believe that Zip compression works best on text data, not a great deal on Pics, which is why jpg developed their compression format. Though I suspect that your point is that zip decompresses to original file. But I still prefer non-compressed file. Tiff will have to do. JPEG 2000 may be the next star image format. It has lossless compression and is alleged to result in smaller file size than TIF. Hi.. I doubt it, it's been around for quite a while, and hasn't made any progress toward popularity at all. Just for the heck of it, I zipped a few tiff's - started at 40 megs, zipped to an average of about 27 megs. But I agree that the way to go is uncompressed, make it as easy and safe as possible for future generations who may want to see them. I would say that you want to archive both tiff and jpeg. Whereas tiff might be a file you are comfortable with and understand many people will not even recognize it as an image file. Film scanned at high resolution and saved as 16 bit/color tiffs take up a lot of room, more then your relatives might want to deal with. There are programs that will convert all your tiffs to jpeg format and resize at the same time if desired. The point is future generations might be more willing to deal with your photos is the collection can fit on to a fairly small part of their hard drive, but not so interested if the collection takes up boxes of DVD. This is not to say you delete or destroy the full resolution version, but that you have the collection in a smaller format for ease of use. Scott |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |