![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
| I have a Canon LIDE600F recently purchased. I have scanned pages from books "two up" so that I can lay the book out flat and get two pages scanned at once lengthwise on the scanner bed. The problem is that since the pages on a thick book do not lie flat, inside margins of the pages tend to scan lighter than the rest of the page, almost with a white bar running up the length of the scanned image towards those inside margins. When I then OCR using OmniPage (into which I'm directly scanning the image), it is almost flawless on most of the page, but loses characters on those inside edges. This is true even if I up the contrast or otherwise tweak it. I have not found the same problem on old scanner, but I think this uses a different scanning technology than old, large scanners and the light bounces off the book differently ... or some such. Can anyone suggest anything? Would using the provided software make a difference or a different OCR program such as Abby FineReader? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <1177715475.414224.86... (AT) e65g2000hsc (DOT) googlegroups.com>, richrobinson2... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com says... I have a Canon LIDE600F recently purchased. I have scanned pages from books "two up" so that I can lay the book out flat and get two pages scanned at once lengthwise on the scanner bed. The problem is that since the pages on a thick book do not lie flat, inside margins of the pages tend to scan lighter than the rest of the page, almost with a white bar running up the length of the scanned image towards those inside margins. When I then OCR using OmniPage (into which I'm directly scanning the image), it is almost flawless on most of the page, but loses characters on those inside edges. This is true even if I up the contrast or otherwise tweak it. I have not found the same problem on old scanner, but I think this uses a different scanning technology than old, large scanners and the light bounces off the book differently ... or some such. Can anyone suggest anything? Would using the provided software make a difference or a different OCR program such as Abby FineReader? No, different OCR software will not help that problem. The problem is that the LiDE scanners have CIS sensors instead of CCD sensors. Meaning, they have no lens to focus the bed onto the scanner, instead the sensor is just up very close to the paper. This means CIS scanners have zero depth of field - if the paper is not touching the glass, it will be out of focus and the OCR will fail. Focus is the wrong term, there is no lens and no focus, it simply relies on the paper being very close to the sensor to capture the image, that is, the paper must be touching the glass. The book pages curve away from the glass at the binding. As a test, scan the book pages regularly, into an image file, and you will be able to see this.... why the OCR fails. The bulky larger-bodied thick scanner models (maybe 6 inches thick instead of 1.5 inch thick) will have better depth of field for such purposes. Still not great, but better, at least not zero. The lens assembly requires that greater room. But this is the price for the compact thin models. -- Waynehttp://www.scantips.com "A few scanning tips" |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
| Which scanners are CCD? Are any under $500? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
No, different OCR software will not help that problem. The problem is that the LiDE scanners have CIS sensors instead of CCD sensors. Meaning, they have no lens to focus the bed onto the scanner, instead the sensor is just up very close to the paper. This means CIS scanners have zero depth of field - if the paper is not touching the glass, it will be out of focus and the OCR will fail. Focus is the wrong term, there is no lens and no focus, it simply relies on the paper being very close to the sensor to capture the image, that is, the paper must be touching the glass. The book pages curve away from the glass at the binding. As a test, scan the book pages regularly, into an image file, and you will be able to see this.... why the OCR fails. The bulky larger-bodied thick scanner models (maybe 6 inches thick instead of 1.5 inch thick) will have better depth of field for such purposes. Still not great, but better, at least not zero. The lens assembly requires that greater room. But this is the price for the compact thin models. -- Waynehttp://www.scantips.com "A few scanning tips" |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
| That's too bad, though I suspected it was only intended for flat single sheets. Someone wrote that CCD scanners are available for as little as $100. Are they good quality, at that price? What then are the recommended uses for CIS vs. CCD scanners in the same price class? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anonymouswrote: Which scanners are CCD? Are any under $500? SB On Apr 28, 9:15 am, Wayne <nos... (AT) invalid (DOT) com> wrote: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |