 | |
Newton rings - FH869G with "anti Newton ring" glass
Scanners And Imaging Devices Scanners Discussions (comp.periphs.scanners)
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
 
| |||
| |||
|
Newton rings - FH869G with "anti Newton ring" glass -
05-19-2007
, 05:15 PM
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I finally received the glass film holder with the "anti Newton ring" glass ... and in two corner areas there are strong, large, Newton rings. Is the because the glass is not sufficiently "tight" and even? Advice? Can you see any change in the Newton rings as you squeeze the carrier with |
sufficiently, "tight" but too "tight" against the non-Newton glass
surface.
Neil
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Recently, Alan Browne <alan.browne (AT) FreelunchVideotron (DOT) ca> posted: I finally received the glass film holder with the "anti Newton ring" glass ... and in two corner areas there are strong, large, Newton rings. Is the because the glass is not sufficiently "tight" and even? Advice? Can you see any change in the Newton rings as you squeeze the carrier with your fingers? If so, and they get larger, perhaps the issue is not sufficiently, "tight" but too "tight" against the non-Newton glass surface. |
The kit comes with a mask and strips so that the film is in contact with
the anti-NR glass at the top but prevented from touching the lower glass.
If properly installed after that, no NR's.
An other option is to replace the bottom piece of glass with anti-NR
glass though some seem to believe this will cause a loss of resolution.
Cheers,
Alan
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Neil Gould wrote: Recently, Alan Browne <alan.browne (AT) FreelunchVideotron (DOT) ca> posted: I finally received the glass film holder with the "anti Newton ring" glass ... and in two corner areas there are strong, large, Newton rings. Is the because the glass is not sufficiently "tight" and even? Advice? Can you see any change in the Newton rings as you squeeze the carrier with your fingers? If so, and they get larger, perhaps the issue is not sufficiently, "tight" but too "tight" against the non-Newton glass surface. I got a reply from Davide Littleboy on groups.yahoo Nikon 8000/9000 group. The kit comes with a mask and strips so that the film is in contact with the anti-NR glass at the top but prevented from touching the lower glass. If properly installed after that, no NR's. That makes sense to me, and is how the glass carrier on my 120tf is |
rings.
Quote:
|
An other option is to replace the bottom piece of glass with anti-NR glass though some seem to believe this will cause a loss of resolution. I wouldn't suggest this approach. Take a look at your AN glass under a |
Regards,
Neil
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Recently, Alan Browne <alan.browne (AT) FreelunchVideotron (DOT) ca> posted: An other option is to replace the bottom piece of glass with anti-NR glass though some seem to believe this will cause a loss of resolution. I wouldn't suggest this approach. Take a look at your AN glass under a loupe and you'll know why. |
glass for the lower glass. (But I'm not going to say this on the Nikon list,
since it's dense of loud folks who think it's a good idea<g>.)
What I'd really like is no lower glass at all and a metal (or rigid plastic)
frame that the AN glass would push down on.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Neil Gould" <neil (AT) myplaceofwork (DOT) com> wrote: Recently, Alan Browne <alan.browne (AT) FreelunchVideotron (DOT) ca> posted: An other option is to replace the bottom piece of glass with anti-NR glass though some seem to believe this will cause a loss of resolution. I wouldn't suggest this approach. Take a look at your AN glass under a loupe and you'll know why. I'll second this. I think Nikon knows what they are doing in not using AN glass for the lower glass. (But I'm not going to say this on the Nikon list, since it's dense of loud folks who think it's a good idea<g>.) What I'd really like is no lower glass at all and a metal (or rigid plastic) frame that the AN glass would push down on. |
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.