HighDots.NET Computer Hardware Forums  

DDS tapes: variations between brands?

SCSI peripheral devices Discussion of SCSI-based peripheral devices. (comp.periphs.scsi)


Discuss DDS tapes: variations between brands? in the SCSI peripheral devices forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Percival P. Cassidy
 
Posts: n/a

Default DDS tapes: variations between brands? - 05-08-2007 , 04:10 PM






I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until
now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be
retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a
package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media
fault") until I retensioned and initialized them.

Since it now about time to pension off all my old tapes, I checked the
prices of replacements and found that IBM 59H4456 or Compaq/HP 152842
are the cheapest (both the same price and much cheaper than Sony) if I
buy a pack of 20 or 50. Dell 09W083 are a little more but still much
cheaper than Sony.

Do some brands of tape need to be retensioned and initialized before
use? Is there any reason not to use the IBM- or HP/Compaq-branded tapes
(probably made for them by somebody else anyway)?

Perce

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Michael Baeuerle
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: DDS tapes: variations between brands? - 05-10-2007 , 04:36 PM






"Percival P. Cassidy" wrote:
Quote:
I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until
now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be
retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a
package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media
fault") until I retensioned and initialized them.
DDS tapes don't support retensioning. The drive have a motor on each
reel and on the capstan, it can always directly control the tension of
the tape. Retensioning is only required for the QIC/Travan/SLR
technology where _both_ reels are driven indirectly by a single motor
via a belt.

Take a look at this to understand the difference (it's in german but the
pictures should say enough):
http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_DDS.html
http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_QIC.html

Quote:
Since it now about time to pension off all my old tapes, I checked the
prices of replacements and found that IBM 59H4456 or Compaq/HP 152842
are the cheapest (both the same price and much cheaper than Sony) if I
buy a pack of 20 or 50. Dell 09W083 are a little more but still much
cheaper than Sony.

Do some brands of tape need to be retensioned and initialized before
use? Is there any reason not to use the IBM- or HP/Compaq-branded tapes
(probably made for them by somebody else anyway)?
I know the issue that some DDS media need to be initialized before the
first use ("mt erase" have done the job for me). IMHO this is a logical
problem (missing signature, TOC or whatever) and says nothing about the
quality of the media itself.


Micha
--
http:/micha.freeshell.org


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Percival P. Cassidy
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: DDS tapes: variations between brands? - 05-10-2007 , 07:34 PM



On 05/10/07 05:36 pm Michael Baeuerle wrote:

Quote:
I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until
now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be
retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a
package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media
fault") until I retensioned and initialized them.

DDS tapes don't support retensioning. The drive have a motor on each
reel and on the capstan, it can always directly control the tension of
the tape. Retensioning is only required for the QIC/Travan/SLR
technology where _both_ reels are driven indirectly by a single motor
via a belt.
OK. Das verstehe ich jetzt.

Quote:
Take a look at this to understand the difference (it's in german but the
pictures should say enough):
http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_DDS.html
http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_QIC.html
Gut.

Quote:
Since it now about time to pension off all my old tapes, I checked the
prices of replacements and found that IBM 59H4456 or Compaq/HP 152842
are the cheapest (both the same price and much cheaper than Sony) if I
buy a pack of 20 or 50. Dell 09W083 are a little more but still much
cheaper than Sony.

Do some brands of tape need to be retensioned and initialized before
use? Is there any reason not to use the IBM- or HP/Compaq-branded tapes
(probably made for them by somebody else anyway)?

I know the issue that some DDS media need to be initialized before the
first use ("mt erase" have done the job for me). IMHO this is a logical
problem (missing signature, TOC or whatever) and says nothing about the
quality of the media itself.
OK. Ich werde die IBM oder HP/Compaq cartridges kaufen. Danke sehr fuer
Ihre Hilfe.

Perce


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Rob Turk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: DDS tapes: variations between brands? - 05-11-2007 , 01:02 AM



"Percival P. Cassidy" <nobody (AT) notmyISP (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
On 05/10/07 05:36 pm Michael Baeuerle wrote:

I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until
now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be
retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a
package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media
fault") until I retensioned and initialized them.

OK. Ich werde die IBM oder HP/Compaq cartridges kaufen. Danke sehr fuer
Ihre Hilfe.

Perce
IBM and HP do not manufacture their own media. There are only a few media
manufacturers in the world, such as Matsushita, TDK and Sony. Fuji may do
their own tapes too. IBM and HP relabel tapes from any of these, and usually
use a dual-source policy. There's no guaranty that the tape you buy from
them today comes from the same manufacturer as the tape that you buy from
them tomorrow.

Rob




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.