![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media fault") until I retensioned and initialized them. |
|
Since it now about time to pension off all my old tapes, I checked the prices of replacements and found that IBM 59H4456 or Compaq/HP 152842 are the cheapest (both the same price and much cheaper than Sony) if I buy a pack of 20 or 50. Dell 09W083 are a little more but still much cheaper than Sony. Do some brands of tape need to be retensioned and initialized before use? Is there any reason not to use the IBM- or HP/Compaq-branded tapes (probably made for them by somebody else anyway)? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media fault") until I retensioned and initialized them. DDS tapes don't support retensioning. The drive have a motor on each reel and on the capstan, it can always directly control the tension of the tape. Retensioning is only required for the QIC/Travan/SLR technology where _both_ reels are driven indirectly by a single motor via a belt. |
|
Take a look at this to understand the difference (it's in german but the pictures should say enough): http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_DDS.html http://micha.freeshell.org/tape/Tech_QIC.html |
|
Since it now about time to pension off all my old tapes, I checked the prices of replacements and found that IBM 59H4456 or Compaq/HP 152842 are the cheapest (both the same price and much cheaper than Sony) if I buy a pack of 20 or 50. Dell 09W083 are a little more but still much cheaper than Sony. Do some brands of tape need to be retensioned and initialized before use? Is there any reason not to use the IBM- or HP/Compaq-branded tapes (probably made for them by somebody else anyway)? I know the issue that some DDS media need to be initialized before the first use ("mt erase" have done the job for me). IMHO this is a logical problem (missing signature, TOC or whatever) and says nothing about the quality of the media itself. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 05/10/07 05:36 pm Michael Baeuerle wrote: I have a Compaq (rebranded Sony) DDS-4/DAT40 autoloader in which until now I have used only Sony tapes. These have never needed to be retensioned or initialized before use, but none of the tapes in a package of Fuji DDS-4 cartridges I just opened would work ("media fault") until I retensioned and initialized them. OK. Ich werde die IBM oder HP/Compaq cartridges kaufen. Danke sehr fuer Ihre Hilfe. Perce |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |